Geothermal Transparency Guide
An overview of regulatory frameworks for geothermal exploration and exploitation
An overview of regulatory frameworks for geothermal exploration and exploitation
The Geothermal Transparency Guide is an online database, initiated and overseen by BBA law firm, which is intended to provide an insight into the legal frameworks governing exploration, exploitation and production of electricity from geothermal resources, in countries where geothermal capacity is being harnessed or is available for harnessing. The regulatory framework in respect of the exploration and development of geothermal energy is in many countries either not existing or fragmented with provisions located in the various sectors of legislation. Many countries rely on laws relating to other energy sources, such as mining. Furthermore, in certain cases no particular administrational authority is entrusted with geothermal matters.
This has in some instances resulted in substantial complications for developers when dealing with public authorities and municipalities, in the attempt to secure exploration licenses and exploit the reservoir. A lack of clarity in respect of the legal framework governing licenses can also be detrimental to public authorities, municipalities and other owners of land containing geothermal resources, as it is critical for such parties to maintain adequate control over the utilization of the reservoirs and make sure that environmental and administrational requirements are being met.
When the terms of a prospective license are not transparent and clear, the risks for financing parties and investors is also increased, therefore making the financing of geothermal activities more time consuming and expensive than necessary.
It is therefore of great importance to explore the possibility of creating certain industry standards for licenses and agreements in the field of geothermal exploration, utilisation and the production of electricity from geothermal resources. If such industry standards are successfully created on an international platform, they could facilitate and increase the development of geothermal energy in the world, which is of the utmost importance, from both an economical and environmental point of view.
We hope that this overview of geothermal regulatory frameworks in the countries included in this database provides a useful insight into certain aspects of the applicable rules in these countries. Such insight can be of importance for the purposes of increasing transparency and awareness of some of the rights and obligations governing applications for licenses to explore, exploit and produce geothermal energy. We also hope that this database can serve as a first step in an eventual international cooperation for the purposes of creating industry standards in this field.
In order to provide an overview of the rules and regulations governing geothermal development, we opted to set forth a list of questions to the most prominent law firms in the field of energy in the countries involved. We acknowledge and stress that neither is this an exhaustive exercise nor does this database provide solutions for public or private parties involved in geothermal energy activities. It can however be useful in gaining a better understanding of the rules applying to such activities. We hope that the information contained herein will be a small contributor in driving us towards a sustainable future.
We emphasize the fact that all contributing law firms have provided their contributions free of charge and for this, we are deeply thankful.
It is finally of vital importance to underline that no information contained herein is supposed to form any legal opinion or statement of facts or circumstances on behalf of the contributing law firms, but merely an overview of the various rules applicable in each country. In this respect, we refer to the Disclaimer, to be found in the database.
Sign up here to receive regular notifications on updates and regulatory framework changes, as our online database continues to expand.
The Geothermal Transparency Guide is intended as a practical guide to the general principles and features of the basic legislation and procedures in countries included in this database and is for general purposes only. The information contained herein does not purport to provide comprehensive full legal or other advice and is not expected to form basis of any advice provided to any parties whatsoever. BBA and the contributors accept no responsibility for losses that may arise from reliance upon information contained in this database. This database and the information provided therein is intended to give an indication of legal issues upon which you may need further advice.
Van Ness Feldman LLP
24. April 2018
1.1 What are the rules on ownership of geothermal resources? Can private parties hold ownership of geothermal resources?
Geothermal resources are regulated by both the federal and state governments. Up to 90% of geothermal resources in the United States are located on lands managed by the federal government. It is possible for a private (non-governmental) party to own geothermal resources, but that is unusual. This Chapter therefore focuses primarily on federally managed geothermal resources. The federal agency charged with managing federal minerals, the U.S. Bureau of Land Management (“BLM”), manages about 58 million acres of split estate lands.
Ownership of interests in real property (known as “estates” in land) may include rights in both the surface estate and the subsurface estate (including subsurface geothermal resources). When the surface and subsurface estates are separately owned, then the ownership is referred to as “split” or “severed.” To understand the current state of geothermal resource ownership in the United States, an understanding of how the surface estate became separated from the subsurface estate is helpful. When land was first acquired by the United States, much of the private ownership of these public lands was established through federal land disposition acts, including railroad land grants, mining laws and homestead acts. The land that was conveyed to private landowners under these initial acts (e.g., the Original Homestead Act of 1862 or the Enlarged Homestead Act of 1909) included mineral (subsurface) rights along with surface rights. It was not until 1910 that the U.S. Congress recognized that some federal land was not only valuable for agriculture, but also subsurface minerals that had a different value. In response, Congress enacted the Stock-Raising Homestead Act (“SRHA”) in 1916, which required that any federal land conveyed expressly reserve mineral rights to the United States—resulting in split estates. The mineral rights reserved under the SRHA have been construed by the courts to include geothermal rights.
In 1970, Congress passed the Geothermal Steam Act of 1970 (“Geothermal Steam Act”), which reserved mineral rights on federal lands to the United States. Any laws passed subsequent to the Geothermal Steam Act in which “mineral rights” are reserved, are construed to include a reservation of geothermal resources.
Apart from federally owned lands, private parties may own geothermal resources depending on how the state in which the geothermal resource is located classifies the resource. In general, the states regulate geothermal resources under one of three classifications as: (i) a mineral, (ii) water, or (iii) something unique (sui generis). Private rights to geothermal resources therefore vary from state to state. States that classify geothermal resources as a mineral generally recognize the surface owner as the presumptive owner, unless the resource has otherwise been severed by deed or some other process and conveyed to another owner. Jurisdictions that regulate geothermal fluids as water under groundwater appropriation systems require an appropriation permit to develop these fluids and may or may not recognize the ownership interest of the surface owner
1.2 Who can grant access to geothermal resources, only state or also landowner?
Under common law in the United States, the mineral estate is the dominant estate. In practice, this means that the owner of the mineral estate has an implied right of access and use of the surface estate as necessary for development and operation of the mineral or other subsurface resource (which may include the geothermal resource). This right is explicitly recognized by federal laws. This right to access the surface estate, however, is not unqualified, and BLM requires the geothermal operator seeking to develop a geothermal resource to make a good faith effort to obtain an agreement with the surface owner for surface access. The operator must engage the surface estate owner in negotiations for: (i) a surface use agreement, (ii) a waiver from surface owner for access, or (iii) an agreement regarding compensation. If an agreement cannot be reached, the mineral owner can post a bond (also known as “bonding-on”) to protect the interests of the surface owner. However, in most cases a bond is not necessary because surface access is granted by mutual negotiation and agreement with the landowner.
1.3 Is exploration/exploitation open to foreign investment?
There is no per se restriction on foreign investment in the geothermal sector. However, any foreign person or entity investing in a business in the United States may voluntarily submit the transaction for review by the Committee on Foreign Investment in the United States (“CFIUS”). CFIUS review is authorized under § 721 of the Defense Production Act of 1950, as amended by the Foreign Investment and National Security Act of 2007, and as implemented by Executive Orders and the regulations published by the U.S. Department of the Treasury. It is not a mandatory requirement to file a notice for review by CFIUS. However, if a notice is not filed, and CFIUS subsequently determines that the transaction raises U.S. national security or critical infrastructure concerns, then CFIUS has the authority to unwind the transaction. A party considering an acquisition of operating geothermal assets (whether a stock or asset acquisition) by a foreign-controlled person should carefully consider whether the acquisition qualifies for CFIUS review. An acquisition of an undeveloped or non-operating lease site may or may not be subject to CFIUS depending on the context of the transaction.
2.1 Which administrative bodies (ministry and/or governmental agencies) are involved in the licensing of geothermal resources, including licensing and developing?
The rights to develop privately and utilize geothermal resources is managed by BLM, which is the delegated authority to issue leases for federal lands.
2.2 Do administrative bodies assign any of their respective roles to a third party, including but not limited to a peer review, during the period of exploration, exploitation and/or production of geothermal resources?
2.3 Is there a government policy in place concerning geothermal resources? If so, what is the object and to what end?
Public policies play a significant role in shaping geothermal growth and development. Policies that are essential to geothermal development include: state renewable portfolio standards; federal and state tax incentives; geothermal leasing and permitting; research and technology support; and pollution and climate change laws.
Federal tax incentives, loan and grant programs, and research support, drive growth in renewable energy, including geothermal energy. As mentioned in Question 3 below, at the federal level, the Geothermal Steam Act which was amended by the Energy Policy Act of 2005, has shaped the development of geothermal resources. At the state level, renewable portfolio standards (“RPS”) have been a crucial driver for geothermal growth and development because RPS require utility companies to have a growing percentage of renewable power generation as part of their energy consumption.
3.1 Is exploitation of resources subject to licensing? Do landowners have the right to exploit recourses without a license? If yes, to what extent?
The rights to develop privately and utilize geothermal resources owned by the federal government may be acquired solely in accordance with the leasing program enabled by the Geothermal Steam Act and amended by the Energy Policy Act of 2005 (“EPAct 2005”). The leasing process is managed by BLM, which is the delegated authority to issue leases for federal lands. BLM issues geothermal leases using one of two processes: (i) either through a competitive auction of lands or (ii) through a non-competitive leasing mechanism. There are two exceptions to this rule: (i) the U.S. Department of Defense may develop geothermal resources on lands within their jurisdiction and, (ii) offshore geothermal leases are authorized and governed by the Outer Continental Shelf Lands Act. BLM’s geothermal resource leasing process is detailed in Title 43, Part 3200 of the Code of Federal Regulations, 43 C.F.R. pt. 3200 (2016).
4.1 Does the landowner or any “project affected people” have a role in the process of granting a license for:
(ii) exploitation, and
(iii) power plant (generation license)?
As discussed above, the mineral estate owner is the dominant estate owner and has an implied right of access to, and reasonable use of, the surface estate. However, BLM has developed policies to protect the rights of surface estate owners and will consider a lease’s effects on private ownership before issuing a lease. Before granting a lease, BLM usually requires the mineral developer to attempt, in good faith, to reach a surface use agreement with the surface owner as to access rights and compensation. The mineral estate owner must show “due regard” for the interests of the surface estate owner and occupy only those portions of the estate that are reasonably necessary to develop the mineral estate. BLM also allows the surface owner to attend and identify development preferences during the reclamation inspection, and to participate in certain onsite inspections and meetings with the geothermal operator. Additionally, BLM will consult with the surface owner prior to approving final reclamation. The private surface owner also has the right to protest and comment on pending lease sales. Notwithstanding these surface owner participation rights, federal law explicitly recognizes the right to exploit geothermal resources without the consent of a surface owner if a bond is posted.
Aside from the mineral estate owner and the surface estate owner, BLM will consult with the Forest Service if the proposed operations are on National Forest System lands. As mentioned in Question #12, if Native American cultural resources will be impacted by the proposed operations, there may be an obligation to consult with the affected tribe(s).
In addition to the BLM process, there are various environmental, health, and safety laws applicable to construction and operation of electric generating facilities, including consideration and issuance of permits dealing with air and water quality, and protected species. A full discussion of applicable environmental laws is beyond the scope of this Chapter, but in many cases there are typically multiple opportunities for various stakeholders, including landowners, to challenge issuance of necessary environmental permits.
As noted elsewhere, no separate license is needed for development or construction of generation plants.
4.2 Will an opposition of a landowner or any “project affected people” have a bearing on the process of granting a license for:
(ii) exploitation, and
(iii) power plant (generation license)?
In a split estate situation, the BLM has developed policies to protect the rights of each of the parties. In determining the relative rights of the mineral estate owner and the surface estate owner, many jurisdictions have adopted the “accommodation doctrine” which limits the rights of the mineral owner by requiring “due regard” for the rights of the surface owner.
Under BLM’s current policy, developers must negotiate with surface owners in good faith and attempt to enter a surface use agreement or to obtain a waiver. The agreement should include access rights and provisions that compensate for damage. In the rare situation where an agreement cannot be reached, BLM may permit the posting of a bond to protect the interests of the surface owner. While the amount of bond that must be posted depends on the land disposal statute, the minimum amount is $1000. As mentioned in the previous question, there are various on-site meetings which provide the surface owner an opportunity to identify development preferences.
As noted elsewhere, no separate license is needed for development or construction of generation plants. See Question #10.3
4.3 Are the terms of land lease agreements regulated and if so, (i) what is a general timeframe of land lease agreements and (ii) what are the obligations for decommissioning at the end of the term?
Yes, the terms of land lease agreements are regulated by the BLM. As detailed in Question 6.1, the primary term for a geothermal land lease is 10 years and there are various types of extensions available after the 10-year period depending on the stage of development. The BLM issues extensions on a case-by-case basis.
Decommissioning, or reclamation obligations, typically includes the abandonment of wells (plugging, capping, and reclaiming the wellsite), the removal of facility structures and infrastructure, recontouring the site and access roads to preproduction contours, and environmental clean-up. To facilitate the natural restoration of the site, vegetation must be replanted.
5.1 Which documents need to be submitted and what is the criteria for obtaining a license for:
(ii) exploitation, and
(iii) power plant (generation license)?
(i) exploration: To conduct exploration on federal land, developers must obtain a Notice of Intent to Conduct Geothermal Resources Exploration Operations (“NOI”) from BLM. “Casual Use” activities, or those that “ordinarily lead to no significant disturbance of federal lands, resources, or improvements” under 43 C.F.R. § 3200.1, do not require a permit. With that said, developers typically submit a NOI even for Casual Use activities. The NOI also allows for more invasive exploration activities such as seismic surveys, electromagnetic surveys, and the drilling of temperature gradient wells. However, any drilling beyond a temperature gradient well will require an approved Geothermal Drilling Permit (Form 3260-002). Upon completion of exploration operations, if the BLM approved the NOI, the developer must send BLM a complete and signed Notice of Completion of Geothermal Resource Exploration Operations (Form 3200-010).
(ii) exploitation: First, the land on which a developer is seeking to conduct geothermal exploitation must be nominated. The land can be nominated by BLM or by the developer themselves using the “Nomination of Lands for Competitive Geothermal Leasing” form. Nominated lands cannot be included in a lease sale until National Environmental Policy Act of 1969 (“NEPA”) (see Question #14) requirements are met and the leasing conforms to the applicable land use plan. After nomination, a developer must complete a Lease for Geothermal Resources (Form 3200-024a) in order to obtain federal geothermal mineral rights. A Geothermal Lease conveys the exclusive right to drill for, extract, produce, remove, utilize, sell, and dispose of all geothermal resources in the lands subject to the lease. As mentioned, any drilling beyond a temperature gradient well will require an approved Geothermal Drilling Permit (Form 3260-002).
(iii) power plant: In order to exploit the geothermal resources and convert them to marketable electricity, developers need an approved Plan of Utilization (“POU”) for the construction of a power plant and related activities. A POU involves a Utilization Plan, Facility Construction Permit (43 C.F.R. § 3272), Site License (43 C.F.R. § 3273), and Commercial Use Permit (43 C.F.R. § 3274). Developers must complete the environmental review process under NEPA before the Site License and Facility Construction Permit will be approved by BLM. The sales of electricity in the wholesale power market (including from geothermal power generation facilities) are largely deregulated and in most cases subject to relatively limited review by the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (“FERC”) so long as the seller is not able to exercise market power.
(iv) generation license: See Question 10.3.
6.1 What is the maximum duration of a license for:
(ii) exploitation, and
(iii) power plant (generation license)?
The time periods and detailed requirements on extensions of license periods can be found in 43 C.F.R. § 3207.5. In general, the primary term of a federal geothermal lease is for a period of ten years. Several different types of extensions are available after the 10-year period depending on the stage of development and BLM issues them on a case-by-case basis:
As a general matter, there is no maximum term for a generation authorization (license) required from the FERC (See Question 10.3).
7.1 What are the general terms of the license for:
(ii) exploitation, and
(iii) exploration drilling and other drilling,
(iv) power plant (generation license)?
Under EPAct 2005, a single lease may be as large as 5,120 acres. As noted above, a geothermal lease has an initial 10-year term but the lease can be extended for two additional 5-year terms by making a minimum payment or meeting work requirements. A lease can also be held for an additional 35 years for production or diligent development, or held for an additional 55 years for commercial production. BLM collects revenue from annual rental fees, royalties, and a nominal processing fee ($145). The annual rental fee of a competitive geothermal lease is fixed at $2 per acre for the first year of the lease, $4 per acre for years 2-10, and $5 per acre from the 11th year onward. Royalties are set at 1.75% and are collected if the project reaches commercial operation in the first ten years of production and 3.5% thereafter. These terms and other pro forma terms that are generally included in a lease are set forth in 43 C.F.R. § 3207. Although these terms are generally adhered to, BLM may waive certain provisions. For example, 43 C.F.R. § 3212.16 provides the lessee with the ability to apply to BLM for a reduction, suspension or waiver of the royalty or rent.
With regard to generation authorization (license) required from the FERC (See Question 10.3).
7.2 Are exploration license holders granted pre-emptive rights with regards to exploitation or do exploration licenses automatically convert into exploitation licenses if the resource has been substantiated? If so, are there any conditions?
No, a NOI or permit does not automatically convert into a Geothermal Lease. A Form 3200-024a, Lease for Geothermal Resources, must be completed to exploit resources. See Question #4.
7.3 Is an exploitation license included in a power plant license or are these licenses separate?
Not included, see Question #4.
7.4 Are there any encumbrances in place for the licence holder to keep a license, once granted?
If the landowner and developer reach an agreement, then part of that agreement may allow the developer to place a surface or subsurface encumbrance on the land in order to further protect the developer’s rights to access and use of the resource. If there is no voluntary agreement, the BLM permit acts, in effect, as an encumbrance on the land.
8.1 What actions by the license holder would warrant revision of exploration-, exploitation- and power plant (generation) licenses?
A lessee can revoke or terminate their lease under 43 C.F.R. § 3213. Only the record title owner may relinquish a lease in full or in part. If there is more than one record title owner for a lease, all record title owners must sign the relinquishment. In order to terminate the lease, the lessee must send BLM a written request that includes the serial number of each lease it is relinquishing. If relinquishing the entire lease, no legal description of the land is required. If relinquishing part of the lease, the request must describe the lands to be relinquished. BLM may require additional information if necessary. It is important to note that there are certain caveats to relinquishing a lease in part: the lease must still contain the 640-acre minimum, all rents/royalties are due before relinquishment, all wells must be plugged and abandoned properly, and the lessee must restore the surface. The applicable regulations do not expressly provide for revision of leases, but this may be subject to negotiation with BLM.
FERC authorizations to sell power at wholesale from a geothermal facility at market based rates are generally conditioned on the seller not having market power in the relevant market. Changes in the seller’s market power analysis could affect the terms of seller’s FERC authorization.
8.2 Does the license granting authority license have the power to revoke or terminate licenses? If yes, what actions of the license holder would warrant the termination of the license?
(i) exploration license,
(ii) exploitation license,
(iii) power plant (generation license)?
Yes, a federal geothermal lease can be terminated by BLM for failure to pay rent, failure to pay royalties and fees, or the failure to complete any of the other requirements under 43 C.F.R. § 3200.4. BLM may also cancel a lease that was issued in error.
8.3 Can the license granting authority set forth conditions into licenses which provide for (i) stricter terms and conditions of licensees or (ii) more lenient terms and conditions for licensees, when such terms and conditions (whether stricter or more lenient) are not otherwise provided for by law?
As mentioned in Question #6, the standard terms of a lease are set forth in 43 C.F.R. § 3207. Any deviation from these terms is at BLM’s discretion. To request a waiver, the lessee must contact BLM directly.
8.4 What remedies does the License granting authority have in order to enforce compliance to the terms and conditions of a license, other than by revoking the license?
If BLM finds a leaseholder is not in compliance with BLM requirements pertaining to utilization operations, drilling, or exploration, BLM will issue a written “Incidence of Noncompliance” directing the leaseholder to take corrective action within a specified amount of time. If the noncompliance continues or is serious in nature, BLM will take one or more of the following actions: enter the lease and correct any deficiencies at the leaseholder’s expense, collect all or part of the bond if one is available, order modification or shutdown of operations, take other enforcement action against a lessee who is ultimately responsible for the noncompliance, or terminate the lease. If the lessee fails to pay rent, fails to pay royalties and fees, or fails to complete any of the other requirements under 43 C.F.R. § 3200.4, BLM can terminate the lease.
9.1 Briefly outline the surveillance carried out by the regulatory authorities during the license period, e.g. with regards to reporting duties and/or on-site visits.
The BLM requires a Monthly Report of Geothermal Operations to be prepared for each month beginning with the month in which drilling is initiated, and filed on or before the last day of the month following unless exception is granted by BLM. The Report includes details regarding individual well production such as the total monthly production or injection of steam and water and the average temperature and pressure of steam going in and steam leaving the well. BLM may inspect all operations to ensure compliance with the requirements of 43 C.F.R. § 3200.4. BLM must be given access during normal operating hours to inspect all facilities utilizing federal geothermal resources. All records and operations pertaining to the operation of a utilization facility, royalty, production meters, and safety training must be available for BLM inspection for a period of five years following the time the records and information are created.
9.2 Which information is required to be submitted to regulatory authorities during the license period for the holder of a license for:
(iii) power plant (generation license)?
As noted above, seller’s FERC authorization is subject to seller not have market power in the relevant market. To that end, FERC typically requires sellers to update their market power analysis every three years. In addition, FERC may initiate its own investigations into market participants at any time.
10.1 Are general terms and conditions, such as duration of Power Purchase Agreements regulated? If no, are there any soft law or general recommendations in place in your jurisdiction?
Wholesale sales of electricity (whether through Power Purchase Agreements (“PPAs”) or simply into organized markets) is largely deregulated and subject to limited review by FERC, as discussed above. Terms and conditions, including prices, of PPAs are not generally regulated as part of the geothermal regulatory regime.
10.2 What is the permitted or general duration of PPA's?
There is no limit on duration of PPAs negotiated and agreed to between buyers and sellers.
10.3 Are public and/or national regulatory authorities involved in any way in forming the terms of PPA's, either directly or indirectly?
As noted above, wholesale of electricity using a PPA is largely deregulated and subject to limited review by FERC. FERC’s review focuses primarily on ensuring that the seller does not have market power that would improperly diminish competition in the relevant markets for wholesale electricity. Apart from that consideration, buyers and sellers of electricity are largely free to negotiate all terms of a PPA.
11.1 Is there any governmental support or funding available for exploration activities?
As a general matter, no. Although from time to time there may be funding available from the US Department of Energy for certain research and demonstration activities, but these are typically pursuant to individual government grant proposal requests.
11.2 Are there any incentives offered by the government or local authorities for utilization of geothermal energy? If yes, in what form (e.g. tax and/or feed-in tariffs) and what are the maximum amounts permitted?
Generally, no, but if the facility loses its status as a QF or eligible renewable energy technology then it will lose all associated benefits and may be subject to penalties imposed by FERC.
11.3 What requirements must the project fulfil in order to be eligible to receive such incentives?
11.5 In the case of production of electricity from geothermal, are there any incentives/rewards for utilizing the geothermal energy for other than producing electricity, such as waste heat?
12.1 Are the rights of indigenous peoples in connection to geothermal resources regulated?
Before the BLM approves an application for Permit to Drill on split estate lands, the BLM must determine if the development is going to affect Native American cultural resources. Native American cultural resources and geothermal resources on tribal lands are regulated by laws such as the National Historic Preservation Act of 1966, NEPA, the Indian Mineral Leasing Act of 1938, and the Indian Mineral Development Act of 1982. Under NEPA review, the impact on cultural resources must be taken into consideration prior to issuance of any applicable federal permits or licenses. Typically, a professional archaeologist will conduct a cultural resource survey and, depending on the survey’s results, the proposed location of the geothermal development may have to be modified to avoid damaging cultural resources. Furthermore, most federal laws impose a federal government trust obligation to consult with an affected tribe.
12.2 To what extent are indigenous municipalities involved in the process of granting licenses?
If the geothermal resources are located on tribal lands, developers will negotiate with the appropriate tribe for a lease, which must be approved by the Bureau of Indian Affairs
13.1 What are the principles regarding retroactivity of laws and regulations, can changes in such rules affect license holders?
Leases that were issued under the Geothermal Steam Act are still honored even though the Act was amended by EPAct 2005 and the process by which a lease is obtained changed from a competitive bid process to an auction process.
14.1 How does taxation in the sector affect license holders?
Please see Question 11.3. In addition, in 2018 the US enacted significant sweeping reforms to the tax code, some of which may affect geothermal developers, and all of which are still under analysis as to their potential effect.
14.2 Please describe and provide information on the applicable tax rate and resource tax.
Please see Question 14.1
14.3 Is the sale of energy subject to VAT?
Please refer to Question #10 on tax incentives.
14.4 Is VAT refundable and what is the procedure for VAT refunding?
The United States has no VAT.
14.5 Is the flow of foreign capital restricted with capital controls? If so, briefly describe the nature of such controls.
15.1 What demands are there regarding environmental impact assessment prior to exploration, exploitation and or production of geothermal energy?
As mentioned in Question #4, nominated lands cannot be included in a lease sale until NEPA requirements are met and the leasing conforms to the applicable land use plan. NEPA requires federal agencies to review the potential environmental impact of proposed actions in order to determine whether the proposed actions will “significantly affect the quality of the human environment.” For purposes of geothermal development, NEPA is usually triggered because the proposed project is on federally managed lands or federal funds are contributed to the project. NEPA review is often conducted multiple times at a given geothermal development project location, including during the BLM’s land use planning and leasing analysis phases, and during a developer’s exploration, drilling, power plant, and transmission project phases. There are various types of NEPA-related reviews and it is not always clear what type of analysis might be required as the decision is made on a project-by-project basis by BLM staff and may change throughout the environmental review process. With that said, either an Environmental Assessment (“EA”) or an Environmental Impact Statement (“EIS”) are the most likely instruments to complete a NEPA review. The analysis considers factors such as: the environmental impact of the proposed action, whether any adverse environmental effects can be avoided through an alternative action and how many resources will have to be committed for the proposed action.
16.1 What other licenses are needed in order to commence exploration, exploitation and/or production with geothermal energy?
As discussed above, the lease issued by BLM grants the lessee access to the land’s geothermal resources. Other principal licenses and permits are noted above. In addition to the licenses and permits discussed above, there may be other state and local permits required but these are typically obtainable in the ordinary course of business (such as a local building permit) and are omitted from this Chapter.
16.2 Which other regulatory requirements are in place, including but not limited to the need to provide insurances or guarantees, in connection with the commencing or continuing of exploration, exploitation and/or production of geothermal energy?
Under Subpart 3214 of Title 43 in the Code of Federal Regulations, the lessee or operator must post a bond with BLM before exploration, drilling, utilization or associated operations begin. The bond must cover all record title owner, operating rights owners, operators, and any person who conducts operations on your lease. BLM will only accept corporate surety bonds and personal bonds.
BLM will hold all interest owners in a lease jointly and severally liable for compliance with the requirements of 32 CFR § 3200.4 for obligations that accrue while they hold their interest. For example, interest owners may be held jointly and severally liable for plugging and abandoning wells or reclaiming the surface and other resources.
17.1 Have there been any recent amendments to the legislation for licensing, exploration and/or exploitation of geothermal energy in the last 15 years? If so, have these amendments made a noticeable impact on the increase or decrease of production of electricity from geothermal resources?
Other than the Geothermal Steam Act that was amended by EPAct 2005, which was mentioned above, there have been no recent amendments to legislation.
17.2 Have any other factors made a strong impact on the production of electricity from geothermal in the last 15 years? If so, for what reasons.
As detailed in Question 11, state RPS programs have impacted the production of electricity from geothermal resources by requiring utility companies to have a growing percentage of renewable power generation as part of their energy consumption.
17.3 Is there a specific legislation in place regarding geothermal extraction?
18.1 When applying for a licence, is it possible to apply for one license or authorization, which provides for multiple or cascade use of the resource, e.g. direct and indirect utilization (generation of electricity, district heating and cooling)?
As mentioned, if drilling beyond a specific temperature gradient well, the applicant will have to apply for a Geothermal Drilling Permit which is separate from an NOI. Drilling Plans may sometimes cover several wells, but a separate drilling permit is required for each well.
18.2 Could mineral extraction from geothermal fluid be included under such cascade usage clauses?
Not applicable because there is no cascade usage clause.
19.1 Once an exploitation license has been granted for the operation of a power plant, along with access to fresh water for power plant operation, can the licence allow for sales and distribution of fresh water to local communities?
As noted above, secondary activities would be subject to commercial agreements and any particular federal, state or local laws that govern the particular activity. In the case of water distribution, depending on the state involved, that activity is typically regulated on the local level. A state or local permit or concession may be required, particularly if there exists a current franchise or concession holder for the area. It is unlikely that BLM, as the geothermal resource permitting agency, would have a direct role in that permitting process.
B B A
v. 1.0., 13 July 2018
BBA Legal ehf., Katrínartúni 2, 105 Reykjavík, reg. no. 661098-2959 (also referred to as ‘’BBA’’ and ‘’we’’’) is the controller of any personal information that we process in connection to the legal services we provided to our clients.
BBA Legal ehf.
c/o Sara Rut Sigurjónsdóttir
Personal information means any information that can be used to directly or indirectly to identify a specific individual.
BBA collects and processes certain personal information for the purposes of providing legal services to clients. Depending on whether you are a client of BBA or whether you are representing a legal person that is a client of BBA.
The following are examples of personal data that BBA processes of individuals that are clients of BBA:
The following are examples of information about individuals that represent a client who is a legal person or an individual that is in another way a contact for a client:
It shall be noted that providing personal data is always optional for a client. If certain information is not provided it may affect BBA’s ability to provide legal advice.
In general BBA collects personal information directly from a client or a representative of a client. In some instances, the information may be provided by third parties, such as the National Register of Iceland, Property Register of Iceland, CreditInfo, Keldan, the Directorate of Internal Revenue, banks or other financial companies, District Courts, District Commissioner and public authorities.
BBA may in some cases collect data through website visits to the Company’s website, www.bba.is, including information regarding the location of the individual that opens the website, the type of browser that is used and general information regarding traffic on the website.
The processing of personal data that BBA holds depends on the purpose of the collection of personal data. For example, BBA processes personal data of a client to:
If a client has provided its consent to BBA for the processing of personal data for a specific purpose then consent is the legal basis for processing. The client can withdraw its consent at any time when the processing of personal information is based on consent. Further, it shall be noted that the withdrawal of consent does not affect the legality of the processing before the withdrawal of consent.
The employees of BBA have access to personal data to the extent necessary to fulfil our contractual obligations towards our clients. Personal data may be delivered to third parties that process data on behalf of BBA or provide services to us. Those parties are for example IT system and software providers, banking and financial service providers as well as debt collectors.
In some instances, BBA has a legal obligation to disclose a client’s personal information to regulatory authorities, law enforcement agencies, district courts and other governmental bodies.
It shall be noted that the attorneys employed at BBA are bound by a legal duty of confidence regarding all information they receive according to Article 22 of Act no. 11/1998, except if they have a legal obligation to disclose information or the client has provided consent for such disclosure. Other employees are also bound by a similar confidentiality requirement.
GDPR is applicable in all countries within the European Economic Area (,,EEA area’’) and data transfers within the EEA area are unlimited if based on an appropriate legal basis. GDPR restricts data transfers to countries outside the EEA area, including the United Stated. BBA uses the services of providers in the United States and transfers data to the United States for example, in relation to the monitoring of our website. As a data controller BBA is responsible for ensuring that our clients personal data is only transferred to parties that provide adequate protection to clients’ personal data. Therefore, BBA only transfers personal data to parties certified as Privacy Shield members or parties who have provided appropriate safeguards such as standard contractual clauses.
Personal information is generally processed and retained as long as necessary to fulfil contractual obligations to clients, legal obligation and legitimate interests of BBA. When data is no longer necessary to fulfil contractual obligations or legal obligation they are deleted. However, BBA may retain personal information relating to legal services for a longer period when obliged by legal and/or regulatory requirements, such as limitation periods for taking legal action and accounting requirements.
Individuals enjoy certain rights in relation to the processing of BBA on personal data. They include the right to:
It shall be noted that BBA is permitted in limited circumstances to deny that personal data is erased, transferred or that access to data is provided. BBA will ensure that the personal data of each client is updated and reliable.
BBA has taken appropriate and reasonable steps to ensure that all personal data is protected from misuse, interference and loss, as well as unauthorised access, modification or disclosure. The measures taken to protect personal data include:
This Policy will be updated regularly in accordance to the changes made by BBA in relation to the processing of personal data. We encourage you to review this policy on a regular basis to be informed about how we use and protect your personal data.